Legislation

State lawmakers across the country have been busy this year trying to curb the most consequential uses of AI in employment-related decisions. As those attempts moved from idea to legislation, two powerful forces have pushed back.

The tech industry is concerned about a patchwork of state rules, and the Trump administration has prioritized removing barriers to AI use. States are reacting by shifting their strategies to narrow, revise, and/or delay legislation. Employers would be wise to stay abreast of
Continue Reading AI in Employment-Related Decisions Part 1: Big Tech and Federal Power

Within the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law on July 4, 2025, is the new “No Tax on Overtime” rule that may positively impact many hourly workers as it relates to their payment of federal taxes starting in 2025. However, this change in the law also presents new challenges for employers and ambiguities that will need to be addressed.

For starters, the new overtime provision is limited to overtime wages paid by employers to employees qualifying for
Continue Reading Issues Related to the “No Tax On Overtime” Provision

On May 19th of 2025, the legislature introduced a bill that gives drivers for Uber, Lyft, Instacart, and similar app-based companies the possibility of self-funded health insurance (in portable benefit accounts that could possibility also receive contributions from the companies if a company, for some reason, decides to help pay for such health insurance coverage) in return for losing their status as employees under current Wisconsin law.

The legislature rushed the hearings and passage of this bill and sent
Continue Reading Network drivers pretense

On July 3, 2025, the Wisconsin Legislature passed Wisconsin’s biennial budget bill. Governor Evers signed the bill into law the same day. Included in the budget bill is a provision establishing a fee schedule for worker’s compensation medical bills generated by Wisconsin hospitals. This is a favorable development for employers and insurers that will limit their worker’s compensation medical expense exposures for medical bills generated by hospitals in Wisconsin.

The new bill creates Wis. Stat. § 102.423 “Health service
Continue Reading New Law Establishes Fee Schedule Limiting Hospital Medical Bills In Worker’s Compensation Claims

The ever-changing landscape of state government requires businesses across all industries to stay informed on the happenings in Madison. Welcome to the July issue of the Capitol Connection.

 In this issue:

  • Governor Tony Evers Signs 2025–2027 Wisconsin Biennial Budget into Law
  • K-12 Education and Child Care
  • UW System and Technical Colleges
  • Tax Relief for Household Affordability
  • Investments in Tourism Industry
  • Health care and Public Health
  • Transportation and Infrastructure Development
  • Support for Veterans and Military Families
  • Agriculture, Conservation, and Clean


Continue Reading Capitol Connection, July 2025

More than three years after the case was originally filed in Dane County Circuit Court, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, held that Wis. Stat. § 940.04(1) does not prohibit abortion in Wisconsin. The statute, the majority held, had been impliedly repealed by subsequent legislation that permitted, but regulated, abortion in certain circumstances. The majority decision in Kaul v. Urmanski, authored by Justice Dallet, held that the statutes enacted subsequent to Wis. Stat. § 940.04(1) could not
Continue Reading Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Legislature Effectively Repealed Abortion Ban with Subsequent Legislation

The Wisconsin governor’s partial-veto power is unique. Although some states grant governors the power to veto entire budget line items, Wisconsin’s governor may veto discrete parts of appropriation bills, including words, punctuation marks, and digits. See generally Wis. Const. art. V, § 10(1)(b), (c). On April 18, 2025, the Wisconsin Supreme Court revisited Wisconsin’s anomalous partial veto power in its tenth ever opinion on the topic, LeMieux v. Evers, 2025 WI 12, which addressed the constitutionality of Governor Tony
Continue Reading Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Governor’s ‘400-Year Veto’ and Affirms Expansive Partial-Veto Power

As of January 1, 2025, more than 300 new laws have taken effect in Illinois, impacting various aspects of daily life, business regulations, and consumer protections. From digital driver’s licenses to salary transparency, these changes may affect individuals, businesses, and professionals across the state. Below is a summary of some of the most notable new laws and their implications.
New Laws in Illinois for 2025
Digital Driver’s Licenses
Illinois residents may soon have the option to carry a digital


Continue Reading Stay Up to Date on New Laws in Illinois for 2025

What happened?

On December 3, 2024, a federal district court in Texas found the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”) to be unconstitutional and issued a nation-wide order to ban it. The case before the court was Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et. al, Case No. 4:24-cv-478 (E.D. Tex.). This means that companies do not need to comply with the CTA’s reporting deadlines.

What is the Corporate Transparency Act?

The CTA would have required the vast
Continue Reading No Need to Report – CTA Blocked

It is safe to say that the Federal Bench in Texas is at it again.  Just a few months ago, the Northern District of Texas struck down the Federal Trade Commission’s nationwide ban on non-compete agreements just days before it was set to take effect.  Ryan LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, No. 3:24–cv–986-E (N.D. Tex.).  Now, on December 4, 2024, the Eastern District of Texas just issued a temporary injunction prohibiting the Federal Government from enforcing the Corporate Transparency
Continue Reading Don’t Mess with Texas: Corporate Transparency Act Is Unenforceable (for now)

The U.S. Government has appealed a federal judge’s order temporarily blocking the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). As a result, the case is now headed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Currently, reporting companies are not required to submit filings. FINCEN has acknowledged this in a recent update to its website, stating: “Reporting companies are not currently required to file a BOIR and are not subject to liability if they fail to do so while
Continue Reading U.S. Government Appeals Block on CTA Enforcement

On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted a preliminary, nationwide injunction enjoining the United States federal government from enforcing the  Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”), which includes the reporting of beneficial ownership information (“BOI Report”) to the U.S. Federal Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”). The court’s reasoning revolved around the constitutionality of the CTA. The immediate impact is that companies are, at least temporarily, no longer required to file a BOI Report with


Continue Reading Corporate Transparency Act Injunction Alert

On Monday, December 2, 2024, Dane County Circuit Court Judge Jacob Frost issued the long-awaited decision involving a November 2023 challenge to 2011 Act 10 by numerous unions and individual employees. On July 3, 2024, the Circuit Court previously indicated the Court would find specific provisions of Act 10 as unconstitutional. A summary of our Legal Update on that July decision from the Circuit Court can be found here.

In the December 2 decision, the Court identified nearly
Continue Reading Dane County Circuit Court Issues Long-Awaited 2011 Act 10 Decision

The ever-changing landscape of state government requires businesses across all industries to stay informed on the happenings in Madison. Welcome to the November 2024 issue of the Capitol Connection.

In this issue:

Election 2024: State Legislature

After the implementation of new legislative maps, months of campaigning, heated rhetoric, a barrage of unsolicited text messages, and lots of junk mail, the 2024 election has concluded.

After the votes were tallied:

  • Democrats gained 10 seats in the Wisconsin Assembly
  • Republicans maintain


Continue Reading Capitol Connection, November 2024

Statewide ballot referenda are not new to voters in the Badger State. There are four scenarios in which a question may be directly asked of voters: whether to amend the state’s constitution; ratification of a law extending the right of suffrage; nonbinding advisory question to measure public sentiment; and, ratifying a law that was passed by the legislature, contingent on voter approval. Wisconsin does not have a direct ballot initiative process. In November 1914, 64 percent of voters rejected
Continue Reading August Constitutional Referenda to Decide Who Spends Federal Funds