State Bar of Wisconsin​

We are a professional association for Wisconsin lawyers. The State Bar provides educational, career development, and other services to more than 25,000 members. We also provide public services, including attorney referrals, public education, and reduced-fee legal assistance for low-income state residents. Our mission is to improve the administration of justice and the delivery of legal services and to promote the professional interests of Wisconsin lawyers.

If you are a solo or small firm practitioner in Wisconsin, you might assume that the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), found at 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., is a headache reserved exclusively for banks, mortgage lenders, and auto finance companies.

That assumption would be faulty. In reality, TILA can apply to local businesses, home contractors, and service providers.

When you pair TILA with Wisconsin’s counterpart – the Wisconsin Consumer Act (WCA), Wis. Stat. chapters 421-427
Continue Reading How to Keep Your Business Clients from Becoming Accidental Creditors

This article was originally posted July 10, 2026, in the Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog. It is reprinted here with permission.

With few exceptions, the development and administration of water law (and environmental law more generally) have been the responsibility of either the federal government or the states. In matters related to the control of water pollution, for example, a “cooperative federalism” approach predominates. A federal statute, the Clean Water Act, provides the substance. Yet it is


Continue Reading The Growing Role of Local Governments in Governing Water Resources

Stock Photo of Doctor Advising Woman Patient
Aug. 17, 2026 – An unborn child has a right of informed consent by statute, and with it, a right to pursue legal action against a doctor, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held in Brekke v. Midwest Medical Insurance Co., 2026 WI 29.

“Charlie May Brekke was a patient under [Wis. Stat. section 448.30] before her birth. Dr. Batley had a duty to obtain informed consent from Samantha regarding herself and Charlie,” wrote Chief Justice Jill J. Karofsky
Continue Reading Supreme Court: Statute Requires Informed Consent to Unborn Child

Stock Photo of a Gavel next to

Aug. 17, 2026 – The dispute in Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Ropicky, 2026 WI 25, will return to circuit court after the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that damage from rain, but not damage resulting from the construction defect, was recoverable as an “ensuing loss.”

Justice Brian K. Hagedorn, writing for the 4-3 majority, said it was adopting Arnold v. Cincinnati Insurance Co., 2004 WI App 195, because it is “more consistent with normal language: that to ensue means
Continue Reading Supreme Court: Rain Damage, Not Construction Defect, Recoverable

Stock Photo of Gavel and Pills Aug. 17, 2026 – Whether a statutory proceeding to restore competency to trial also could authorize involuntary medication for dangerousness resulted in the Wisconsin Supreme Court holding 6-1 in State v. N.K.B., 2026 WI 22, that the proceedings are separate. The tally overstates agreement. The case became a dispute between three interpretations of the relevant statutes. “We conclude that the best way to read [Wis. stat. section 51.61(1)(g)3.] in light of [Wis. Stat. section 971.14]’s separate,
Continue Reading Supreme Court: Competency to Stand Trial and Dangerousness Separate

For decades, Delaware has been the leading destination for out-of-state corporate formation. While there are many reasons for this, Delaware views its advantages as including its system of laws, which Delaware describes as “optimal” for “engaging in ethical and profitable business,” and which are predictable, stable, and kept up-to-date every year.[1] Moreover, it has dedicated business law courts with expert corporate law judges who are impartial and resolve disputes efficiently. In addition, the Secretary of State’s office acts
Continue Reading From Delaware to Wisconsin? What the ‘Dexit’ Trend Could Mean for Clients

Wisconsin, like most states, has a growing shortage of skilled civil trial lawyers, especially in rural areas throughout the state. Jeffrey Muszynski discusses the steps Wisconsin is taking to address this issue and urges members of the bar to do more to keep alive the tradition of highly skilled advocates in the state.

For many younger attorneys in Wisconsin, trial work can feel increasingly out of reach. This is especially true outside of criminal cases, as civil trials become


Continue Reading To Build Trial Lawyers, Give Young Attorneys Their Day in Court

As part of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) new National Enforcement Plan (NEP), the commission stated its intent to “eliminate the use of disparate impact liability theories in investigations,” and vowed “not [to] commence, develop, or continue to pursue litigation advancing disparate impact claims.”

The NEP, voted into effect on June 4, 2026, replaces the EEOC’s Biden-era Strategic Enforcement Plan and is intended to comply with the Trump Administration’s Executive Order 14281, issued in April 2026, directing
Continue Reading Profound Changes Afoot to EEOC’s Guidelines and Enforcement in Disparate Impact Cases

July 27, 2026

In family court you will encounter a lot of voices – parents, their attorneys, maybe a child support attorney, and often, a guardian ad litem representing the best interests of the child.

In Wisconsin, a guardian ad litem (GAL) is another attorney in the courtroom, and what they determine to be in the child’s “best interest” is directly dictated by statute.

But the way that we do it here in Wisconsin is just one of the


Continue Reading Beyond Best Interests: Rethinking Child Representation

July 22, 2026 – The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed with the Wisconsin attorney general in his dispute with the Wisconsin Legislature to cont​rol settlement funds that the Wisconsin ​Department of Justice (DOJ) receives, in Wisconsin State Legislature v. Kaul, 2026 WI 28 (July 10, 2026).

“We conclude that the attorney general complies with [Wis. Stat. section 165.10] when, in accordance with the straightforward language of the statute, he deposits settlement funds into the general fund,” wrote
Continue Reading Supreme Court: Attorney General Controls Settlement Funds

July 22, 2026 – A 65-year-old man’s appeal of a circuit court order continuing his protective placement in a nursing facility generated dissent among Wisconsin Supreme Court justices on whether the majority properly applied the standard of review in Racine County v. R.P.L., 2026 WI 26 (July 7, 2026).

The court held 4-3 in a decision authored by Justice Susan M. Crawford that under the “mixed question of fact and law” standard of review, the evidence was
Continue Reading Supreme Court Debates Protective Placement Evidentiary Standards

  • July 21, 2026

     

    Guardians ad litem play an important role in adult, child, and family matters. A GAL provides recommendations to the court that shape decisions involving adult and minor guardianships, protective placement, physical placement, and legal custody, among other matters.

    If you already are a guardian ad litem (GAL), thank you for using your skill, knowledge, and experience in making best-interest recommendations for the vulnerable populations whose cases you are appointed in.

    GAL work can be incredibly


Continue Reading Guardian ad Litem Work: Challenging, Meaningful, and Needed

René Jovel, an assistant general counsel, shares his inspiring journey from L.A. to Milwaukee, with a pit stop at Northwestern University, navigating multiple cultural environments and forging a unique legal career path. Discover insights on the realities of law school, the impact of constituent services in the U.S. Senate, and the evolving landscape of in-house legal roles.

Host Emil Ovbiagele leads this lively discussion, which centers on René’s road less traveled, the power of staying true to oneself, and
Continue Reading Episode 31: René Jovel’s Unique Journey from L.A. to Milwaukee, from Political Sphere to In-house Counsel

July 15, 2026 – The Wisconsin Supreme Court denied a records request for Notice of Voting Eligibility (NVE) forms because a 5-2 majority interpreted the guardianship statutes as excepting the forms from a public records request in
Wisconsin Voter Alliance (WVA) v. Secord, 2026 WI 27.

“The legislature said, with limited exceptions, ‘court records pertinent to the finding of incompetency are closed,’” wrote Justice Janet C. Protasiewicz for the majority. “Thus, the [WVA] does not have a right
Continue Reading Supreme Court: Voter Eligibility Forms Confidential

Timeshares are not for everyone.

Many people appreciate the regularity of knowing they have a block of time reserved to vacation in a specific resort each year. However, preferences change, the ability to utilize the timeshare may not be as initially advertised, and annual resort fees and maintenance costs often increase each year.

Owners often conclude the time has come to divest themselves from their timeshare interest and find themselves stuck in a contract of indefinite length.

For
Continue Reading Wisconsin Victory Highlights Legal Tools to Fight Timeshare Exit Scams


Stock Photo of Blurred Trees and Lake
July 7, 2026 – Tribal sovereign immunity defeated a claim to bind real estate covenants to the Menominee Indian Tribe and its representative, a 4-3 Wisconsin Supreme Court majority held in Legend Lake Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Keshena, 2026 WI 21.

“We conclude that nothing abrogates, waives, or otherwise precludes the Tribe’s sovereign immunity in this case,” wrote Justice Susan M. Crawford for the majority. “Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment of dismissal.”

Chief Justice
Continue Reading Wisconsin Supreme Court: Sovereign Immunity Stops Covenant Enforcement