Litigation Blog | Litigation Section

This blog discusses issues important to attorneys engaged in civil litigation, insurance law, and tort law. Topics include changes in the statutes, important appellate and Supreme Court decisions, insurance law, practice tips and pointers, procedural issues, evidentiary issues, jury trials, and more. Published by the State Bar of Wisconsin's Litigation Section.

The section strives to further the development and improvement of the civil litigation practice by monitoring, commenting upon, and proposing legislation, and by sponsoring and presenting CLE programs. The section has an email list, and supports law students’ trial advocacy training and the protection of the adversarial and jury systems.

Members of the State Bar of Wisconsin may join the section by visiting https://www.wisbar.org/formembers/groups/pages/join-a-group.aspx (login required).

Website: https://www.wisbar.org/forMembers/Groups/Sections/LitigationSection/pages/home.aspx

Subscribe
Visit Blog
By: Litigation Section | State Bar of Wisconsin​

Blog Authors

Barbara A. O'Brien
Sarah A. Zylstra
Matthew C. Lein
Jacqueline Chada Nuckels
Jonathan D. Cook
Christina Davis Sommers
Edward E. Robinson
Erik H. Monson
Thomas J. Donnelly
Andrew J. Lawton
Ralph J. Tease
Monte E. Weiss, Kristen S. Scheuerman
Eric L. Andrews
Heather L. Nelson
Amy M. Risseeuw
Ryan R. Simatic
James R. Troupis
David S. Blinka
Nelson W. Phillips

Latest from Litigation Blog | Litigation Section

​

The State Bar of Wisconsin Litigation Section is one of few professional organizations that brings together adversaries.

Hopefully, we don’t normally think of ourselves as adversaries, but this section involves attorneys who consistently advocate for opposing parties with a balance of defense and plaintiff members on the board. While we may be on opposite sides, we understand that many of our struggles are the same and we usually work collaboratively to find solutions.

For those challenges that are…
Continue Reading Asking for a Friend: How to Avoid Aggravating Opposing Counsel

https-www-wisbar-org-sitecollectionimages-blog-construction-blog-social-media-1200x630-jpg

“Jury trials are going the way of the dinosaur.” “Mandatory mediation has taken trials away from us.” I have heard some version of these quotes for the better part of the last two decades while practicing across two different states. The words are usually uttered by gray-haireds boasting how they built skills and reputations as top trial attorneys based on trying “hundreds of cases” throughout their careers, yet bemoaning that young lawyers today have no chance to become as…
Continue Reading Finding and Developing Our Future Trial Attorneys

​
Every first-year law student learns about the concept of adverse possession. On the outskirts of these lessons are rules regarding easements. In Wisconsin, these two concepts combine when it comes to utility companies and the placement of their equipment to deliver energy and telecommunications. About Easements An easement is the grant of a nonpossessory property interest that grants an easement holder permission for the use of another person’s property for a limited and specific purpose.1 Easements, therefore,…
Continue Reading Prescriptive Easements: Overhead to Underground

Two fairly recent decisions highlight the Wisconsin public records law’s presumption of openness, with limited exceptions, and the mandamus process by which challenges to that policy of openness occur. In the case of
Friends of Frame Park v. City of Waukesha,1 the requested records were disclosed shortly after the petition for mandamus was filed, and the court explained that, even after the records were released, the requester is entitled to relief as the prevailing party if the authority’s…
Continue Reading Two Recent Appeals Court Decisions Highlight Open Records Laws

The members of the State Bar of Wisconsin Litigation Section recognize that we serve a diverse community as Wisconsin lawyers. We believe our section, and the legal community at large, is strongest when it reflects (and looks more like) the communities we serve and the people we represent.The Litigation Section welcomes members of every gender, race, culture, age, sexual orientation, marital status, religion, geographic domicile, and physical ability.Jacqueline C. Nuckels, Marquette 2004, is an attorney with Jacobs Injury Law, …
Continue Reading State Bar Litigation Section Offers Sponsored Memberships to Diverse Attorneys

One case short of a top 10 list, this is a summary of nine recent decisions from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals that discuss insurance coverage.

Readers should note that several of the decisions discussed are unpublished, per curiam decisions, so an understanding of Rule 809.23(3)(a)-(b) is important.

Despite a prohibition on publication, the per curiam decisions discussed in this article are important in that they help the reader understand how courts have analyzed various coverage issues, and ​that…
Continue Reading Nine Recent Insurance Coverage Appeals Court Decisions

Under Wisconsin’s workers’ compensation regime, if a workplace injury is caused by an employer’s violation of safety rules and regulations – including those of U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) – the injured worker is entitled to additional workers’ compensation benefits.

The extra benefits are equal to an additional 15% of the allowable benefits with a maximum additional benefit of $15,000, according to Wis. Stat. section 102.57.
Workers’ Compensation in Wisconsin
As in most…
Continue Reading Wisconsin Workers’ Compensation: Impact of OSHA Safety Violations and Penalties

https-www-wisbar-org-sitecollectionimages-blog-litigation-blog-header-1200x630-jpg

Zoom depositions have presented interesting challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. When the court reporter is not physically present in the room with the deponent and/or the deponent is masked and socially distanced, the accuracy of the transcript can suffer. Combine this with scientific or technical testimony, along with screen “freeze” and other technical glitches, and – voilà – you have the perfect recipe for a transcript laden with errors.How does an attorney address the circumstance of “I didn’t say…
Continue Reading Transcript Errata in the Time of COVID-19

https-www-wisbar-org-newspublications-publishingimages-article%20images-road-closed-sign-construction-blocked-1200x630-jpg

​
For real estate to have value, you have to be able to get
to it. The right of ingress and egress to the public roadways from a property is called “access,” or an “easement of access.” Access is an inherent property right. Any property abutting a public roadway has an easement of access to the road, even without an express deed or grant.Yet, a property’s access rights are not unlimited. The State (and municipalities) have a legitimate governmental…
Continue Reading The State Removed Access to Your Clients’ Property. Now What?

Third-party negligence claims are legally complex, because both the employee and the employer have claims against any money damages that are recovered via an insurance settlement or a trial verdict awarded against a third party.

Any recovery from a third-party negligence claim must be split between the employee and the employer based on the formula set forth in the Wisconsin third-party liability statute.1 This article provides some background on third-party negligence claims and discusses how third-party awards are…
Continue Reading Splitting Awards in Third-party Negligence Claims

The use of boilerplate objections in response to written discovery – interrogatories, requests for documents, and requests for admissions – has proliferated in civil litigation, even though it has no basis under the rules.

All attorneys are familiar with the routine “form” boilerplate objections: relevance, overbroad, oppressive, burdensome, harassing, vague, ambiguous, attorney client-privilege, and attorney-work product, etc. The problem with using boilerplate objections has been heightened by the practice of prefacing discovery responses with a “general objections” section, which…
Continue Reading The Scourge of Boilerplate Objections

There are some men in this world who are born to do our unpleasant jobs for us. Your father’s one of them. – Miss Maudie, speaking about Atticus Finch, in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird
After four decades of practicing, I still often think of Atticus Finch in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. He is, I suspect (and hope), what we as attorneys aspire to be: defender of the defenseless, courageous in the face of scorn, undaunted…
Continue Reading Volunteering as a Lawyer: What’s the Point?

https-www-wisbar-org-sitecollectionimages-portrait-sommers_christina_100x137-jpg

A Wisconsin appeals court recently held in Nelson v. Loessin1 that joinder statutes cannot be used by defendants to bring all injured parties involved in the same accident into same lawsuit.

According to the appeals court, neither Wis. Stat. section 803.03  “Joinder of persons needed for just and complete adjudication,” nor Wis. Stat. section 803.05  “Third-party practice,” can be used by a defendant causing an accident to force all injured parties into a single lawsuit.

Nelson v. Loessin: Facts

In…
Continue Reading Unwilling Plaintiff: Appeals Court Weighs In on Compulsory Joinder

Substantial time, preparation, and expense goes into any trial. It can therefore be extremely frustrating (to say the least) when the trial court announces a jury verdict that is defective because it violates Wisconsin’s five-sixths rule – thereby potentially requiring the entire case to be retried.

Sometimes the five-sixths rule problem could have been avoided, had the trial court perceived the issue before announcing the verdict and reinstructed the jury to continue deliberations – possibly leading to one or…
Continue Reading Civil Jury Verdicts: The Five-sixths Requirement in Wisconsin

https-www-wisbar-org-sitecollectionimages-portrait-andrews_eric_100x137-jpg

While attending a 2017 Claims Litigation Management (CLM) Diversity and Inclusion Institute Conference in Chicago, Illinois, I attended a session titled “Diversity in Demand: What Buyers Want.” The session explored what insurance buyers, in this case Fortune 100/500 companies, are seeking from their industry service providers.
Specifically, this session primarily focused on these companies’ demand for diversity and inclusion in the insurance industry based upon research showing that, when insurers have members who represent the target customers, the team…
Continue Reading The Metaphorical Unicorn: Diversity and Inclusion in Litigation Practice

https-www-wisbar-org-sitecollectionimages-portrait-troupis_james_100x137-jpg

In the early years of the Western District Federal Court’s “rocket docket,” I recall Judge Barbara Crabb and Judge John Shabaz wrestling with how to interpret the Gordian knot of patent claims.
How, in the name of all that constitutes the English language, could someone create an endless string of arcane and archaic terms, seemingly haphazardly arranged, to describe the simplest invention? And if the invention was not so simple … now that was as a lawyer’s paradise (assuming…
Continue Reading A Judge’s Plea to Litigators: Help Me Resolve the Case