Criminal Law Section Blog | Criminal Law Section

This blog is published by the State Bar of Wisconsin's Criminal Law Section, which represents judges, prosecutors, criminal defense attorneys, and academics with the purpose of improving the practice of criminal law in Wisconsin and promoting respect and fairness.

Members of the State Bar of Wisconsin may join the section by visiting https://www.wisbar.org/formembers/groups/pages/join-a-group.aspx (login required).

Website: https://www.wisbar.org/forMembers/Groups/Sections/CriminalLawSection/pages/home.aspx

Latest from Criminal Law Section Blog | Criminal Law Section

Imagine you were just charged with a criminal offense for the first time in your life.

At your initial appearance, the judge or commissioner informs you that you are presumed innocent, but sets bond at $10,000. You come from poverty, and there is no chance that you or your family could post that amount of money.

You are put onto a bus. They take your clothes and all your belongings, and in exchange give you a uniform and a
Continue Reading Protecting the Presumption: The Constitutionality of Pretrial Detention in Wisconsin

Federal law establishes harsh mandatory minimum penalties for defendants who possess certain quantities of specified controlled substances.

One of the few available mechanisms for obtaining a sentence below a mandatory minimum sentence, commonly referred to as the safety-valve provision, is outlined in 18 U.S.C. 3553(f) and §5C1.2 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. A sentencing court is not bound by the mandatory minimum prison sentence if a defendant qualifies for safety-valve relief.
Eligibility for the Safety-valve Provision
The safety-valve
Continue Reading The Safety-valve Provision: Does ‘And’ Mean ‘And’?

Rare is a law school commencement address that does not include a stirring, evocative plea to the new members of the legal profession to change the world,1 leading to the inevitable question:
What ethical limitations apply to a lawyer advocating systemic reforms?
First: The Rules
While the rules encourage efforts to improve the law, your clients come first!

The first rule is to zealously advocate for your client.2 When all parties are represented by skilled, competent counsel,
Continue Reading The Supreme Court Rules and Ethics for Agents of Change

The recidivism risk of individuals who have been sentenced to prison often figures prominently in criminal justice policy debates.

Nationally, the most frequently cited recidivism figures come from a series of large-scale studies conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). The BJS recently released its
latest recidivism report, and this one is its most ambitious yet – covering repeat-offending over a ten-year period following release from prison.
About the Study
The BJS tracked
Continue Reading New Recidivism Study Contains Surprises

The United States Supreme Court in 2004 famously adopted a new approach to the Confrontation Clause in Crawford v. Washington.1 Writing for the majority in Crawford, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that henceforth an out-of-court statement’s admissibility as evidence at trial would depend, subject to a few narrow exceptions, on whether the statement was “testimonial.”

However, in that preliminary exploration of the new jurisprudential terrain, Scalia provided little clear sense of what would make a statement “testimonial.”

Two
Continue Reading Wisconsin Supreme Court, a New Jensen Decision, and the Confrontation Clause

The recent court of appeals decision, State v. Nhia Lee, which is now pending in the Wisconsin Supreme Court, highlights the challenges the State Public Defenders Office (SPD) has in finding counsel to take its conflict and overflow cases, especially in rural parts of the state. It also highlights the need for additional communication between the SPD and the circuit courts about efforts to appoint counsel.

To that end, the SPD has created uniform procedures for tracking and
Continue Reading Evolving Challenges in the Appointment of Counsel in Criminal Court


My law partner and I stared out our office windows on a blustery day in March 2020. Gazing upon an eerily deserted Capitol Square in Madison, we digested what living in a pandemic meant.We were not able to wrap our minds around it at the time. The virus was a spring snowstorm bearing down on Wisconsin in the early days. We wrestled with tasks that had been mundane. How does a person safely go grocery shopping and why
Continue Reading A Pandemic Positive: Changes in Courtroom Practice Increases Access