Loeb & Herman S.C.

Loeb & Herman, S.C. has established itself as one of Wisconsin’s top family law practices through competent and creative representation of clients and the use of innovative approaches to handling family law issues.  We pride ourselves as being at the cutting edge of the ever changing law and offering clients the highest degree possible of service.

Loeb & Herman S.C. Blogs

Latest from Loeb & Herman S.C.

With a lump or two in my throat, I’m going to address one of the most difficult issues in the area of law — the complicated situation of those suffering with mental health conditions who are involved in our legal system. I am certainly not going to solve any problems or, unusual for me, even propose a solution. This article is simply my observations regarding a terrible problem, not as a mental health therapist or provider, but as a
Continue Reading Mental health and the law

First, let’s look at what happened in 2010. In an election between Justice Louis Butler and challenger Michael Gableman (yes, him), an ad ran showing the mug shot of a convicted rapist next to a photo of Butler.  As it happened, both were African-American, and the implication, reminiscent of the Willie Horton ad run against Michael Dukakis in the 1988 presidential campaign, was that Butler was responsible for getting the rapist out of prison and thus allowing him to rape another victim. In fact,
Continue Reading High court shuns truth in advertising

The Super Bowl is over. Days are getting longer. The best words in the English language are: “Pitchers and catchers report.” Baseball will soon return!

With America’s pastime in mind, I have to ask the  what they were thinking when they recently issued their (gulp, 28-page) opinion in Morway v. Morway? I mean, it’s one thing to swing and miss at a 100 mile per hour fastball. It’s quite another to swing and miss
Continue Reading Swing and a miss!

Happy New Year! As usual, I’ll start the new year with a review of my columns from last year – some more controversial than others.

By far, the most scandalous was my column that juries are an unreliable means of getting to the truth in a contested trial. In the column, I quoted my felony team captain from my (initial) days as an assistant district attorney, Jon Peter Gennrich: “If a decision has to be made whether
Continue Reading Never a dull legal moment in 2024

December 2, 2024

Frederick P. Kessler died on November 12, 2024. He is survived by his wife of 58 years, Judge Joan Kessler, two daughters and grandchildren. He was first elected to the Wisconsin Assembly before his 21st birthday and served as a Milwaukee County judge from 1972 to 1978, 1978 to 1981 and 1986 to 1988. In 2004, he was reelected to the Wisconsin Assembly and served until 2018.

My favorite Judge Kessler story (although not
Continue Reading Remembering Judge Frederick P. Kessler

My last two columns have advised the Wisconsin Supreme Court. I’m sure they appreciated it and simply forgot to thank me.

So, to be fair, I now have some advice for Wisconsin trial courts (including court commissioners):  Serve at the convenience of the parties and lawyers, not by your own, archaic and sometimes inefficient rules.

Specifically, one positive manifestation of the pandemic (my dear late mother used to say that it takes an awfully ill wind not to
Continue Reading Advice to Wisconsin Trial Courts

In last month’s column, I made several very useful suggestions (if I may say so myself) to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for improvements during their new term. Shockingly, not one member of the court thanked me for the helpful advice, nor have they (so far) adopted any of my suggestions.

Since I’m sure this was simply an oversight and that the court welcomes my commentary, I would like to weigh in on a present case where the court
Continue Reading Finality at last. Maybe.

The 2024-2025 term for the Wisconsin Supreme Court just began, and I thought it prudent to offer them some advice as to how to improve their performance this term.

No, they didn’t ask my opinion, and they’ve ignored my advice in the past.

But I’m sure that’s merely an oversight.

So here, as a public service, are five ways (there could be more, but my column has a word limit) for the Wisconsin Supreme Court to improve.
First
As
Continue Reading Advice to the Wisconsin Supreme Court

In Better Call Saul, Jimmy McGill, the (ethically challenged but charming) main character, can’t get hired at his brother’s fancy law firm. So when he’s left with no other options, he does criminal defense work. It’s pretty far from the work he wanted.  Art mirrors life. It seems that a lot of lawyers aren’t inclined to do this work.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice Annette Ziegler recently announced the creation of an Attorney Retention and Recruitment Committee to consider
Continue Reading Tackling the defense lawyer shortage, Kim Wexler style

A recent Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion illustrates the tough position police are in when deciding, in a miniscule period of time, whether to stop a vehicle or detain a suspect.  It seems to me that the court made this position even more difficult.

In State v. Wiskoski, 2024 WI 23, a driver fell asleep behind the wheel of his truck at a restaurant drive-thru. The police were called when a restaurant employee knocked on the truck window and
Continue Reading Damned if you do, or don’t

June 10, 2024

Remember when your kid wanted to throw a birthday party, and they had to invite the whole class? You know, because it was the right thing to do? Yes, even that kid that no one liked got an invite, and the party went off without a hitch.

The Wisconsin State Bar Association is throwing a party soon—and Wisconsin Law Journal isn’t invited.

The bar association’s annual meeting is June 19-21, 2024 in Green Bay. One would
Continue Reading WLJ not invited to the party: State Bar closes doors to media

Before April 24, 2024, Roger G. Merry was a licensed lawyer in the State of Wisconsin despite numerous disciplinary actions. On that date, the Supreme Court finally decided enough is enough and revoked his license, overriding the recommendation of the referee who (amazingly) recommended a one year suspension. Disciplinary Proceedings Against Roger G. Merry, 2024 WI 16. In a concurring opinion, authored by Chief Justice Annette Ziegler, five justices (a majority of the court) agreed with the decision
Continue Reading Life Means Life, or Not

Yes, you read correctly; I’m not a fan of jury trials.

Case in point: The death of O.J. Simpson serves as a reminder of the failure of the jury system. Does anyone really believe that Simpson was not the murderer? If not, why would someone stab two strangers to death for no reason whatsoever?

Two reasons demonstrate that such a belief would be stupid. First, unlike a shooting, stabbings are almost always an act of passion. If a thief
Continue Reading The Case Against Jury Trials

Let me start with the good news (which seems to be in short supply right now): The Alabama Supreme Court decision on IVF does not apply in Wisconsin.

Given Gov. Evers’ veto power and the makeup of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, it’s not likely to be the law here anytime soon. For that matter, the decision does not even apply to Alabama anymore, as it was quickly reversed by legislation.

Still, the decision raises some interesting issues
Continue Reading Sweet Home Alabama? Not So Much

Watching the lawyers involved in numerous high-profile trials, from the various Trump cases to the Michigan mother of the school shooter, causes me to wonder: just how much do these lawyers actually believe what they’re advocating?

The practice of law can be highly disingenuous. As a friend of mine once put it: “Sometimes I feel like a prostitute where I’m assuming a position in exchange for a fee.”

Being a lawyer brings innumerable variations on this theme, some more
Continue Reading Law as a Career

One of the fun parts of writing this column is having free shots at the legislature and the appellate courts regarding their actions (or in one case, inaction) during the year. Not willing to be satisfied with just one free shot, my first column of each year revisits my prior year’s columns and reviews my opinions.

“No problem can withstand the assault of sustained thinking.” — Voltaire

In January, I discussed the proposed constitutional amendment that was designed to
Continue Reading A Look Back at 2023’s Debacles in the Law