Constitutional

July 22, 2026 – The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed with the Wisconsin attorney general in his dispute with the Wisconsin Legislature to cont​rol settlement funds that the Wisconsin ​Department of Justice (DOJ) receives, in Wisconsin State Legislature v. Kaul, 2026 WI 28 (July 10, 2026).

“We conclude that the attorney general complies with [Wis. Stat. section 165.10] when, in accordance with the straightforward language of the statute, he deposits settlement funds into the general fund,” wrote
Continue Reading Supreme Court: Attorney General Controls Settlement Funds

July 22, 2026 – A 65-year-old man’s appeal of a circuit court order continuing his protective placement in a nursing facility generated dissent among Wisconsin Supreme Court justices on whether the majority properly applied the standard of review in Racine County v. R.P.L., 2026 WI 26 (July 7, 2026).

The court held 4-3 in a decision authored by Justice Susan M. Crawford that under the “mixed question of fact and law” standard of review, the evidence was
Continue Reading Supreme Court Debates Protective Placement Evidentiary Standards

July 15, 2026 – The Wisconsin Supreme Court denied a records request for Notice of Voting Eligibility (NVE) forms because a 5-2 majority interpreted the guardianship statutes as excepting the forms from a public records request in
Wisconsin Voter Alliance (WVA) v. Secord, 2026 WI 27.

“The legislature said, with limited exceptions, ‘court records pertinent to the finding of incompetency are closed,’” wrote Justice Janet C. Protasiewicz for the majority. “Thus, the [WVA] does not have a right
Continue Reading Supreme Court: Voter Eligibility Forms Confidential


Stock Photo of Blurred Trees and Lake
July 7, 2026 – Tribal sovereign immunity defeated a claim to bind real estate covenants to the Menominee Indian Tribe and its representative, a 4-3 Wisconsin Supreme Court majority held in Legend Lake Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Keshena, 2026 WI 21.

“We conclude that nothing abrogates, waives, or otherwise precludes the Tribe’s sovereign immunity in this case,” wrote Justice Susan M. Crawford for the majority. “Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment of dismissal.”

Chief Justice
Continue Reading Wisconsin Supreme Court: Sovereign Immunity Stops Covenant Enforcement

Stock Photo of a Clock on Court Files Held by Lawyer July 7, 2026 – The lack of an examiner’s required written report no later than 48 hours before the final involuntary civil commitment hearing “did not deprive the circuit court of competency to proceed,” a unanimous Wisconsin Supreme Court held in

Outagamie County v. M.J.B.
, 2026 WI 23. “Although this time limit protects important interests,” wrote Justice Susan M. Crawford, “nothing in the statutory scheme suggests that the legislature intended that failing to make the examiners’ reports accessible
Continue Reading Supreme Court: 48-Hour Rule Didn’t Affect Circuit Court Competency

Stock Photo of Blurred View of Hospital Hallway

July 7, 2026 – A 2023 civil commitment order had sufficient evidence to support it beyond the alleged hearsay, and collateral consequences made the issue suitable for resolution, a 5-2 majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided in Waukesha County v. R.D.T., 2026 WI 24.

“We hold that Ryden’s appeal is not moot,” wrote Justice Rebecca Frank Dallet for the majority. “We further conclude that the order should not be vacated because, even if the circuit court erred,
Continue Reading Supreme Court: Recommitment Hearing Hearsay Only Harmless Error

This week we are celebrating the birth of our nation – 250 years of the great experiment of the democratic republic of United States of America. It has been 250 years since we adopted the Declaration of Independence. 250 years of declaring the right to “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” and “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to
Continue Reading Celebration of the Great Experiment

Posted on June 30, 2026 in Drug Crimes
For decades, federal law treated an “unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” the same way it treated violent felons when it came to gun ownership. Using drugs of any kind outside of a medically indicated reason, like a prescription, automatically stripped that person’s Second Amendment rights.

On June 18, 2026, the United States Supreme Court changed that. In United States v. Hemani, the court ruled that the
Continue Reading Supreme Court Rules Unlawful Drug Users Aren’t Automatically Prohibited from Owning Guns

Stock Photo of Money and Mortarboard
June 19, 2026 – A state program designed to encourage retention of minority students in private and technical colleges failed strict scrutiny under recent U.S. Supreme Court precedent, the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided in Rabiebna v. Higher Educational Aids Board (HEAB), 2026 WI 20 (June 18, 2026).

“We hold that [the] HEAB has failed to demonstrate that the legislature’s goals of increasing diversity and equalizing educational opportunities for certain students are compelling in this instance,” wrote Justice Annette
Continue Reading Wisconsin Supreme Court: Minority Grant Program Unconstitutional

June 16, 2026 – The Wisconsin Consumer Act (WCA) didn’t apply to a residential lease dispute, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held, reversing the court of appeals in Koble Investments v. Marquardt, 2026 WI 19 (June 5, 2026).

Six members joined the majority opinion written by Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley, who concluded “Wis. Stat. § 427.104 does not govern a residential lease under which rent is payable on a monthly basis because it is not an ‘agreement to
Continue Reading Wisconsin Supreme Court: Consumer Act Didn’t Apply to Lease

June 5, 2026 – A City of Milwaukee election official wanted to show it’s easy to fraudulently obtain absentee military ballots.

In succeeding, she committed election fraud, the District I Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed in State v. Zapata, No. 2025AP425-CR (May 12, 2026).

“We conclude that Wis. Stat. § 12.13(3)(i) prohibits making false statements for the purpose of actually or constructively obtaining an absentee ballot, and [Kimberly D.] Zapata constructively obtained the ballots she requested,” wrote
Continue Reading Wisconsin Court of Appeals: Intent Didn’t Prevent Election Fraud

​By Erik Reinthaler
WJI Intern

A federal judge recently dismissed the U.S. Department of Justice’s lawsuit to force Wisconsin election officials to produce the state’s unredacted voter registration list.
In a narrow and technical ruling on May 21, Western District of Wisconsin Chief Judge James D. Peterson found that the unredacted list is not subject to disclosure under the Civil Rights Act of 1960. The judge did not address issues of voter privacy.

“While the judge didn’t rule


Continue Reading Wisconsin’s Voter List Protected by Federal Judge: Decision Explained

Posted on May 31, 2026 in Civil Rights
In 2026, both federal and Wisconsin state law restrict firearm possession for people with certain convictions. Losing your gun rights after a criminal conviction for a felony or misdemeanor domestic violence charge is usually permanent. For many people, it’s one of the most frustrating consequences of a criminal record.

But depending on your situation, there may be a legal path to restoring those rights. At the very least, it’s worth understanding
Continue Reading Can You Get Your Gun Rights Back if You’ve Been Convicted of a Felony or Domestic Violence?

April 28, 2026 – The asbestos dust that a steamfitter breathed, causing mesothelioma, resulted in safe-place statute liability for Pabst Brewing Co., a 5-2 majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided recently in

Estate of Carol Lorbiecki v. Pabst Brewing Co.
, 2026 WI 12.

“As the owner of the brewery, Pabst owed a non-delegable duty under the safe-place statute to frequenters on the premises, a category that includes employees of independent contractors like Lorbiecki,” Justice Rebecca Frank
Continue Reading Wisconsin Supreme Court: Asbestos Created Safe-Place Statute Liability

stock photo
April 22, 2026 – A statute immunizing health care professionals during the COVID-19 state of emergency did not violate the constitutional right to a jury trial, a unanimous Wisconsin Supreme Court recently ruled in
Wren v. Columbia St. Mary’s Hospital Milwaukee, Inc. (2026 WI 11), barring a medical malpractice lawsuit from a stillborn childbirth. Because the Wisconsin Constitution “empowers the [L]egislature to alter or suspend particular common law causes of action,” the immunity statute suspended Savannah Wren’s


Continue Reading Wisconsin Supreme Court: Pandemic Doctor Immunity Statute Constitutional